In a surprising turn of events, digital wallets associated with the controversial Libra token scandal have liquidated failing memecoin positions to accumulate approximately $61.5 million worth of Solana (SOL).
Tracing the On-Chain Capital Flight
Blockchain analytics have flagged significant movement from addresses previously tied to the Libra project, a venture currently under intense scrutiny for alleged fraud. According to on-chain data, two primary wallets—identified as "Libra Deployer (Defcy)" and "Libra Wallet (61yKS)"—executed a strategic rotation of assets. After holding roughly $57 million in USDC, these entities aggressively purchased SOL at an average price point near $135.
Transaction Highlights
Wallets Involved: Libra Deployer (Defcy) & Libra Wallet (61yKS)
Asset Acquired: Solana (SOL)
Total Value: ~$61.5 Million
Source Funds: Drained liquidity from failing memecoins and USDC reserves.
This massive accumulation occurred shortly after the wallets pulled approximately $4 million from a collapsing memecoin, effectively draining the last remaining liquidity from that market. This activity has drawn the attention of market watchers, as it represents a rapid shift from a politically linked, controversial asset into a mainstream Layer-1 cryptocurrency.

Political Controversy and Legal Probes
The timing of these transfers is critical. The Libra token launch had previously garnered significant media attention due to its promotion by Argentine President Javier Milei, who later attempted to distance himself from the project as its value plummeted. Investigators allege that the coin's creators removed as much as $99 million from circulation during the launch phase, sparking multiple fraud probes in both Argentina and the United States.
The broader pattern of meme tokens tied to politicians has raised fresh worries about transparency and investor protection, with some lawmakers and regulators taking a closer look.
Despite the active investigations, the on-chain movements demonstrate that the entities behind these addresses retained sufficient control to migrate assets across blockchains. This has raised serious questions regarding the efficacy of current regulatory frameworks to freeze assets in real-time.
The Regulatory Enforcement Gap
The ability of these wallets to freely trade tens of millions of dollars while under investigation highlights a persistent challenge in crypto enforcement. Reports indicate that while fraud probes are active, the gap between the announcement of an investigation and the actual legal authority to seize or freeze assets allows bad actors to wash funds through high-liquidity assets like Solana.
Analysts warn that this episode serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with celebrity-endorsed tokens. As authorities struggle to coordinate cross-border enforcement, the liquidity of major chains provides a potential exit route for funds derived from controversial projects.